In today’s technology-driven marketplace, delivering superior IT service management is a requirement . As such, organizations must monitor key infrastructure performance indicators and business services, all defined in :
However, they must do this in a way that maximizes IT productivity while keeping costs low. Let’s take a look at these three, then dive deep into OLAs in particular.
The below graphic shows how the three commitments work together:
The main difference between OLAs and SLAs is that they represent different commitments:
In addition, the OLA typically has a smaller target group compared to an SLA, with more detail on technical aspects of the problem or service.
In ITIL and ITSM frameworks, an OLA represents the relationship between an IT Service Provider and another part of the IT organization. It describes relationships at the operational level, including those between:
All of these relationships are captured in a document typically owned by the Service Management Team.
At the most basic level, the OLA functions as a document that serves as a matter of record between parties:
The General Overview does three important things:
This section lists all the stakeholders involved and will include their names, titles, and roles.
This part of the document contains:
This identifies every internal or external service provider involved and describes their responsibilities, in great detail.
Here, operating hours are covered in depth, as well as escalation policies. This section covers a few main topics:
This section pertains to the term of the OLA and offers a schedule or timeline for audits, reviews and reporting.
Putting together an OLA is time-consuming as it requires precision, attention to detail and knowledge of how an OLA corresponds with an SLA.
The body of the SLA mandates a few things with regards to an OLA:
It is important to note that these mandates do not cover how SLAs themselves are structured. See our previous post on best practices for creating SLAs for more detail on this aspect.
If you are writing or creating an OLA, here are some best practices to consider:
Structuring OLAs within a multi-sourced environment is inherently more complex than creating them within a single organization. However, you can avoid the common pitfalls of multi-sourced OLAs by implementing the following strategies:
How do you know whether your organization is primed to use OLAs to maximize collaboration across internal and external teams? The short answer is that if you work with clients, it’s time to brush up on your OLA expertise using the tips above.
There are also considerations to make to determine if you should use OLAs across internal groups or multi-sourced vendors:
Operational-Level Agreements sometimes get confused with Service-Level Agreements because of their connected nature. However, understanding the distinction between the two is important because it ensures all internal and external resources are on the same page when it comes to providing services to the end-user.
Overall, OLAs serve as excellent tools for enterprise organizations who have embraced digital transformation by:
These postings are my own and do not necessarily represent BMC's position, strategies, or opinion.
See an error or have a suggestion? Please let us know by emailing blogs@bmc.com.
BMC works with 86% of the Forbes Global 50 and customers and partners around the world to create their future. With our history of innovation, industry-leading automation, operations, and service management solutions, combined with unmatched flexibility, we help organizations free up time and space to become an Autonomous Digital Enterprise that conquers the opportunities ahead.
Learn more about BMC ›